NEWS PROVIDED BY
Anti-Globalist International
June 6, 2025

OPINION, June 6, 2025 /Standard Newswire/ — Does the passage of the WHO Pandemic Agreement on May 20, 2025, create the framework to usher in a new era of globalist control, masquerading as health care?  Even though the United States and Argentina have withdrawn from the WHO, will these countries nevertheless be affected by its machinations? Here are six paramount threats posed by the new Treaty:

• National Sovereignty. This treaty represents a threat to national sovereignty by establishing an unelected, unaccountable globalist organization at the helm of international health care policy and implementation, “[r]ecognizing that the World Health Organization is the directing and coordinating authority on international health work . . .”  (Preamble, emphasis added).  The treaty further expands the WHO’s purview not only to exercising its authority during actual pandemics, but also during potential pandemics (Article 1 (C)) and during the times between pandemics (Article 2(2)) – in other words, at all times, in perpetuity. Further, nations are expected to amend their domestic legal and regulatory frameworks in alignment with the Treaty, further eroding national sovereignty. (Article 8; Article 11 (6)).

• The Treaty requires nations to “prevent misinformation [and] disinformation.”  (Preamble, page 6). “Misinformation and disinformation” are not defined in the Treaty, but we can discern what these words mean from the WHO’s behavior during the Covid-19 pandemic:  any information that differs from the official WHO narrative, even if true.  Censorship of dissenting opinions constitutes a clear violation of the right to free speech.

• Digital IDs. The Treaty requires nations to endeavor to develop “technical and digital health resources.”  (Preamble).  While digital health IDs are not specifically mentioned in the Treaty, the framework for these is set forth in the Amended International Health Regulations (Articles 35 and 36; Annex 6).  WHO Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus announced the launch of the WHO-EU Global Health Certification Network on June 5, 2023.  These digital health IDs may serve as the precursor to the broader Digital ID depicted in this chart posted on the website of the World Economic Forum.  This chart proposes that Digital IDs be required to access health care, open a bank account, buy and sell online, travel, access social media, file taxes, vote, collect government benefits, and to own a telecommunications device (such as a cell phone or laptop).  Is the ultimate goal to set up a global biotech surveillance police state that could track citizens under the pretext of global health, similar to the China Social Credit System?­

• One Health. The One Health Approach posits that “the health of people is interconnected with animal health and the environment” (Article 5), including domestic animals (Introduction).  This interconnectedness can lead to surveillance and control of virtually every aspect of life on earth.

­• Expedited Approval of Vaccines. The Treaty requires nations to “strengthen” domestic regulations to ensure that they have the “legal, financial and administrative frameworks” necessary to fast track the approval of vaccines and other medications, potentially short-circuiting important safety and testing protocols.  (Article 8 – formerly Article 14).

• Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System. The Treaty sets up the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System (PABS) to “promot[e] the rapid and timely sharing of ‘materials and sequence information on pathogens with pandemic potential.’”  (Article 12). This system will concentrate all the world’s most deadly pathogens into the hands of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party and the pharmaceutical industry.  The WHO may then share them with labs all over the world, ostensibly to develop vaccines, diagnostics and other treatments.  The WHO and Switzerland have already established a partnership for a global “WHO Biohub System,” the purpose of which is “to create a fast and reliable system for sharing materials that could cause epidemics or pandemics.”   This system poses a significant risk of escalating the chances of pandemics caused by lab leaks, as well as bio-terrorist attacks.  All nations will be affected, regardless of whether they are members of the WHO.  Pathogens know no borders.

The Pandemic Treaty is dangerous on numerous fronts, and we need to continue to expose and oppose it, internationally.  It is not a done deal.  Even though the Treaty was adopted on May 20, 2025, it will not be open for signature until after an Annex articulating the details of the PABS system is also adopted – probably in May, 2026.  In addition, it will need to be ratified by at least 60 member nations.  Therefore, failure either to come to agreement on the PABS Annex or to reach 60 ratifications would stymie its entry into force.

Other nations should see the withdrawal of the U.S. from the WHO as a clarion call to consider taking similar action.  We need a consortium of free nations collaborating to address global health concerns, without the interference of the irredeemably corrupt World Health Organization.

For more information, visit AntiGlobalist.net.

SOURCE Anti-Globalist International

CONTACT: Reggie Littlejohn, 310-592-5722, reggielittlejohn@gmail.com